Test Prep

Philosophy


Our Test Prep Philosophy

We believe that confidence on a test rises
as perceived difficulty lowers.


We believe that perceived difficulty of a test
lowers as the fundamentals of its content are acquired.


We believe that the fundamentals, by nature,
are simple, easy concepts to understand.


Concepts that are easy to understand are easily remembered,
and things easily remembered are simple to implement during tests.


When students know the simple concepts they need
to score well on a test, they have everything they need to succeed.

Expert Advice

What are the experts saying?



Excerpts by Loren Pope, 40-year college admissions veteran:



“No prep course is going to lift a 400-bracket scorer

into the 600 level … Naturally, no quick fix can do

the work of a long habit of reading good books.

A seventeen-year-old who has had little interest and

little practice in these skills for eleven school years

isn’t likely to become adept in a few weeks
.”



“Since the test is of ‘developed ability,’ as the Educational Testing

Service (ETS) says, the longer and more demanding the

course, the more it’s likely to help. Youths with a reading

habit aren’t as likely to be helped much since they already have

the tools and tend to score in the six hundreds or better anyway
.”



A prep course is much more likely to boost the math score,

and ETS has long said it is helpful to be taking a good

math course at the time.”



If, after a prep course, one’s scores go up thirty or forty points each

in the verbal and math, nothing has really been accomplished


Rarely have I known of one-hundred-point increases in the

verbal score, and they were unusual cases.”



What are these “tools” that Pope is referring to?

They are the Fundamentals of reading: a competent reading speed, the ability to scan text and pick out important information, and a mature attitude toward varying difficulty levels and technical writing.

Consumer Reports

Have You Read The Consumer Reports?


In mid-2006, Consumer Reports WebWatch released a study comparing 10 online test prep programs out there, complete with the pros, cons, and effectiveness of each. Interestingly enough, they came to the exact same conclusion as Loren Pope (College Admissions Guru) and the Educational Testing Service: there is no “magic pill” students can take to fix years of not studying.

“The SAT is designed to be challenging, and despite marketing

claims made in the promotional materials of many online SAT

test prep sites, there are no secrets or tricks that can substitute

for years of elementary, middle and high­ school education. Just as

you can’t grow a plant faster by watering it more, you can’t get a

higher SAT score with last ­minute cramming
.”


Are You Already Starting To See That “Test Prep” Is The Wrong Ladder Leading To The Wrong Rooftop?

Read the whole report to find the same startling discoveries we did: Most companies make outrageous score increase claims with little or no data to back up their promises, and anyway:

“Number2.com was the only completely free service tested, and it

performed exceptionally well against expensive, better ­known products,

such as The Princeton Review and Kaplan’s, which cost $399 each.”


(If you are having trouble with the link you can download the report here.)

Research

A few things worth mentioning

A 1500 SAT score is 170 points away from
needing remediation across the board!


The Community College of Denver found that students who score at or below certain levels on the SAT aren’t even Fundamentally ready for college and need remediation before admittance.

Subject ACT Score SAT Score
Math 19 460
Reading 17 430
Writing 18 440


Wikipedia reports that 55% of students score at or below 1500 for the SAT and 21 for the ACT!


Are we really graduating approximately 50% of our children with educational deficiencies and then sending them out into the world? It certainly appears that way, because this isn’t the end of the story.



The National Institute for Literacy found that, “Sixteen of out seventeen 17-year-olds can not read and gain information from a specialized text, for example the science section of the local newspaper.”

Test prep won’t help students who are academically deficient, and if it is any kind of answer at all, it is certainly the wrong answer for the real problem. We know this from experience, observation, and research, and that’s why we only focus on your child’s fundamentals: because it’s the only thing that really matters anyway when preparing for exams.

A student with great fundamentals will still perform well without test prep, but a student who lacks them will do lousy no matter how much test prep they receive.

Free Help

Man, if you want free help with test prep then GO GET IT!

Nobody is stopping you, and we encourage it! We are not a test prep business and have no plans on ever becoming so. We tested the Number2.com program, found it to be most satisfactory, and could not imagine how a paid course would have done a better job to prepare us for the SAT or ACT (they have a GRE Preparation module also).


A few critical components Number2.com does not have are personal coaching, Fundamentals training, and live weekly classes, and while these obstacles did not stop us from successfully testing their program, we recognize that students need personal guidance and interaction to help build confidence. So here’s the deal:

This free resource is so effective and easy to use, that we decided to provide the personal support for the wheel instead of reinventing the wheel itself.

All your kids need to do is:

1) Download the n00b-to-Ninja Guide for free (and read it).

2) Create their free account at Number2.com and make sure they add “andrew(at)thinkarchimedes.com” as their coach (Please note that (at) = @, just avoiding spam bots here).

3) Make sure we are white listed in their email filter so they receive updates for free classes and coaching sessions. As their coach, we can log in to see how your child is doing, where he or she is struggling, how much has been completed, and correct repeated mistakes.